Oct 092013
 

hate peopleLast week I was rear-ended. As I posted then, I let the police officer take down the other driver’s info, which he said would be passed on to me in a report, and gave me the report number. I could have taken the driver’s info down myself, but I trusted that this process would work. I had expectations of someone other than myself. Naturally I was disappointed.

The report didn’t have the insurance information. It turns out the other driver didn’t have his current insurance on him (and I suspect he may not have been insured…). I have no way to contact the other driver now. Supposedly his name/address/phone is in that report, but I can’t see it online or have any information relayed to me by phone. My insurance company is not able to access this report easily either, they have to make a written request and turn-around time can be over a month. I can make a written request for that same information (and I will), but again the turn-around time is lengthy and there is a fee as well. All this could have been avoided if I simply remembered to never expect more than nothing from anyone else.

At a recent party my SO had trusted a friend to bring a few things. I don’t recall what exactly – paper plates maybe? They ended up not coming, and so the item was missing. I told her this was why I never bother asking others to bring things and just personally provide everything that I want to be at any party I host. She complained that all she’d expected from someone else was, really, anything more than nothing. And I replied that this was expecting too much. Expecting more than nothing from someone other than yourself is always expecting too much. I often get more than nothing, and I’m always pleasantly surprised when it happens. But I never expect it anymore.

This mirrors an old quote (which I was originally told was Benjamin Franklin’s, but a googling shows that there’s many permutations of this saying that go back to the beginning of history) – “Expect the worst but hope for the best. You’ll never be disappointed and often pleasantly surprised.” I can’t seem to apply this to my life on a grand scale – I’m still very much an optimist about humanity as a whole. I think we’re getting stronger, better, smarter. Our problems are grand, but our potential is grander. Things are getting better all the time, even if it’s slow.

However I have almost completely internalized this on the micro scale. Individual people often suck. In the words of Charles Schulz (who was likely paraphrasing Edna St. Vincent Millay) – “I love mankind… it’s people I can’t stand.”

Expect nothing from people and your life will go much smoother.

Oct 072013
 

anvil headI was in a car accident on Oct 2nd. I seem to be OK. As far as I can tell I suffered a mild concussion – I was foggy the rest of that day and ALL of the next day. And by foggy I mean I had a hard time holding my concentration on anything, and all my cognitive tasks took longer. I was barely able to get my work done at my day job. :/ And this was after sleeping for 12 hours the night of the accident. I had a hard time carrying on a conversation with my SO, and everything seemed to be happening in a haze similar to a bad hangover.

By the third day I seemed to be doing better though. And I think I’m ok now.

This period was very scary, but I consoled myself with the knowledge that it was temporary, and I would soon be back to normal. But it did provide for an interesting context. Is this what it’s like to be (for lack of a better word) dumb? I can’t imagine doing much with my life in that state. How could one pursue any really challenging goals without the ability to focus and think? I don’t know if I would want to continue life in that state, but I’m not sure I’d have the presence of mind to do anything about it.

Is that what it’s like to be very old, when senility starts to set in? No wonder people don’t want to live forever, if they fear that this is what eternal life would be like.

I can’t imagine what it must be like to be in a profession where blows to the head are common. How do parents allow their children to participate in football games? How is this even remotely legal? How can you function as a human with repeated trauma to the soft, fragile thinking organ? I suppose it should be an adult’s right to use and use-up their bodies however they see fit, but before you’ve reached an age where you’re considered mentally competent to make your own choices, how can any adult entrusted with your well-being watch you doing that? I’m more functional when I’m drunk! (well, not crazy drunk. But I haven’t gotten crazy drunk in a while, and regular-drunk is less debilitating than that blow was). And this wasn’t even a severe concussion – my car was drivable after the accident, and I was able to walk around under my own power.

Remember that article that linked leaded gasoline with crime?  In retrospect it shouldn’t be surprising that brain damage leads to bad social outcomes.

I just saw a couple days ago: A high school in Texas, faced with budget issues, cut it’s sports program rather than it’s art/music/math/etc programs. It saved $150k/year and… “That first semester, 80 percent of the students passed their classes, compared with 50 percent the previous fall.”   Given my latest experience, I’m not surprised.

In summation – sports that involve blows to the head (football, soccer, boxing, etc) should be banned from schools. Now. Today.

Oct 042013
 

131002_001

Yesterday I was sitting at a red light when someone behind me, not paying attention to the road, plowed into the back of my car.

My car is still running, although it’s going to need a lot of work. I am extremely grateful to the people who immediately came to our aid. The blow left me a bit dazed and I was wandering circles around my car, trying to figure out what I was supposed to do next. Fortunately I did remember to call my SO and let her know I’d been hit and I’d be home late, so she wouldn’t worry. But after that… what was the procedure? Call the cops? I didn’t have their number on hand…

The six people who stopped and came to help us were an immense help. They called the cops and helped direct us. I’m glad we live in a society where people still do that. I wish I could thank them again.

The cops came pretty quickly, which turned out to be an unfortunate thing. The officer (Ramirez) told me not to bother getting the other driver’s insurance information – he would take care of all that. All the information would be in the police report, and he’d give me the incident number as well as a phone number I could call to get my own copy and any information I’d need. In my foggy state this sounded like a perfectly fine idea. This is the sort of efficiency we like to see! All the information together in one place, easily accessible, and gathered by the authorities rather than the people who were just involved in an accident and my not be thinking clearly (or too injured to write down insurance information). It turns out I forgot the most important rule of life.

Don’t ever trust anyone else with anything important. Insurance information – that’s important. The cop – he’s someone other than me. Sometimes you have no choice and you have to rely on trust, but this was not one of those situations. I could have taken down that info myself and had a personal copy. I’m sure you can guess what happened.

I called the next day and the other driver’s info hadn’t been entered into the system. And the officer isn’t scheduled to come back to work until Sunday. So in the meantime I’m paying for the doctor’s visit and other expenses out-of-pocket, and I have to hope that his insurance company can be persuaded and cajoled into reimbursing me with less than 6 months delay and a dozen hours on the phone. I am displeased, to say the least. Let my stupidity be a lesson – always take down all the info you can. Snap pics of the insurance card. Cell phones are awesome.

I did suffer a mild concussion. More about that next post.

Oct 022013
 

This is a cross-post from my podcast.

Last week that I was asked to do a presentation on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality for a local con. I said ok and put together this little talk. The video’s about 25 minutes. It’s for the uninitiated, a brief explanation of Rationality, Rationalist Fiction, and HPMoR. It was my first time doing public speak and I was crazy nervous. The next one will be better, but this ain’t too bad.

Sep 302013
 

sati01Sometimes people try to imply that those who don’t want to die don’t care about others. For example, if put this way:

“I’m dating a guy who wants to be frozen and wake up in 1000 years and plans to find a new girlfriend then.”

We sound pretty awful. Which is the entire purpose of these “How can you imagine living without your partner?” questions. They are not SERIOUS questions, they are intentional libel. This is evident if you think about them for even a few minutes.

The asker of this question knows perfectly well how someone can go on living without their partner because they see it all the time. Even the happiest and strongest relationships still almost always end with one of the two still alive. And that person goes on living, and finds happiness again. It’d be like accusing your grandma of never really loving your grandpa because a few years after he died she was still alive, and had even had the gall to remarry. The question “how can you imagine being with someone else?” is faux-outrage. It’s moralizing in its most contemptible form.

I don’t WANT to live on without my lover. But I know it won’t end the world.

I can’t force anyone to take a life-saving medical intervention any more than I can force someone to be cryonically preserved. I would be sad if my partner didn’t take a life-saving medical treatment to prevent her from dying at 40, just like I’d be sad if she didn’t get frozen so she could live to 1000 with me. But I wouldn’t kill myself if she died at 40 either, so that’s not a reasonable reason to ask me to die before 1000.

To say otherwise is to endorse Sati

Sep 252013
 

Miracle_Max to blogI dunno why other people blog, or how, but I do it because my thoughts used to be dead-weight. I would think a lot, like I assume most people do. Long, meandering chains of contemplation. While driving from point A to point B. While showering. Far, far too often while laying in bed trying to fall asleep, which kept me up for hours (problem now solved!).

I came to realize that often I was simply thinking the same things over and over again, walking the same path over and over. Like rewatching a movie you’ve already seen twelve times. There was the illusion of progress, due to the effort and the changing scenery, but in the end I hadn’t gone anywhere.

Moreover, this energy was completely wasted. The thoughts were contained within myself, never placed anywhere. To any outside observer they might as well not have happened. I could as well be the deaf/mute village idiot for all they knew. All this mental work was accomplishing exactly nothing.

So I took up blogging, which to me is simply taking the internal narrative that’s running through my head while I’m showering and typing it up. I’ve already put in the work of thinking up this crap, I might as well put in the tiny, tiny extra bit of effort required to permanently record it. Now it is at least visible to the outside world. I can reference it if need be. Ten years from now I can look back at what an idiot I was back when I was younger. There is something to show for it.

(That’s why the book review posts – I always find myself thinking about a book after I’ve finished it)

As a side effect, I’ve found that it greatly reduces the hamster-wheeling in my head. Once those thoughts are put down on paper (figuratively) and published (hah!) they usually cease to plague me, or do so to a MUCH lesser extent. It’s amazingly freeing.

It’s not a panacea, sadly, because once those thoughts are down and I can quit rethinking them new thoughts surface to take their place. Thus I have to keep blogging/writing/etc. But at least now I’m treading new ground, rather than chasing my tail. I think it helps.

If nothing else, it feels good.

Sep 042013
 

No_one_caresLately I’ve started to actually seriously try writing something. For those who have found themselves befriended by aspiring writer, and have been tricked into reading a draft of their next story – my condolences. I hope it’s as painless as possible. However for those who like the idea of being a beta-reader, here is what every author really truly wants:

Tell Us What Sucks

Seriously. It can be very hard to read your own work and notice what’s missing and what’s overwrought. We cannot fix the shitty bits if we don’t know they are shit. Be specific if at all possible. I was told a recent story was “Fantastic! A bit wordy.” That’s nice, but this does not help me. I’m not trying to get praise and flattery from my friends, I want my writing to be stronger. The same story, given to a different friend, was returned to me with many notes and highlights. Most memorably, two lines in the middle of a paragraph were highlighted and noted with “No one cares.”

That was without a doubt one of the best pieces of feedback I have received. That is EXACTLY what I want to know! In retrospect, they were unnecessary details that slowed the pacing without adding anything at all. The words “No one cares” summarized precisely what the problem was, and implied how to fix it! (Those lines were immediately excised). The story is stronger now.

The friend afterwards confessed she was very worried writing that, because she didn’t want to hurt my feelings. To everyone with a friend writer – DO NOT WORRY ABOUT THAT. Surgery always hurts a bit. But what, you want to be stuck limping along with a twisted leg the rest of your life? You take a little bit of pain to make it heal right. The whole can only be improved if the rot is burned out. Your writer will thank you profusely (as I did). Any writer who responds to good criticism with anger and withdrawal is not a serious writer. They don’t care to make the best story they can, they’re just fishing for praise at their friend’s expense. It’s best not to bother with those, but please don’t do your friend the disservice of assuming that’s what they’re going for without reason.

Yes, it’s a lot of time and effort for very little reward. I’d really recommend against volunteering for early readings if that’s not something you like doing. For those of you who are willing to put up with us and give up your time, we are extremely grateful.

And to my beta-readers, again – thank you!

Aug 292013
 

the-dude-white-russianRecently an acquaintance posted that she doesn’t make long-term plans because you never know when you might die. She could be gone next week, so she enjoys every day as much as possible without worrying about the future.

In practice, this means coasting by at a comfortable job, a lot of social activities in the evenings and weekends, a fair bit of recreation alcohol and marijuana use, lots of media consumption, no savings, and being really out of shape.

This is, at an objective level, a stupid thing to do. You probably won’t die next week, so taking care of your body, building up some savings, and doing something with your life are all really good ideas. More to the point – they actually feel better in the long term! You’re failing to enjoy every day as much as you could by focusing on immediate gratification because it’s not nearly as fulfilling.

But interestingly, I don’t think that her motivation is flawed. I am motivated by the exact same worry. I could die next week. And there are still so many things I need to do! The HPMoR podcast is incomplete. I haven’t had every sexual experience I’ve wanted to yet. I haven’t written a novel, and have only just started getting some of the stories I have bottled-up inside down on paper. There’s two dozen books on my must-read list that have been stagnating there for years, and dozens more waiting in the wings. I haven’t met most of the authors I idolize, and I haven’t visited a single city in Europe or Asia. I will die soon, and I have so much to do before then. I can’t get it all done fast enough.

So no, I can’t discourage the “you may die next week” mindset, because it motivates me to do more than simply abide. If all I did was lounge around enjoying myself I might as well never have lived at all.

Aug 132013
 

28349I was taken to the previously-mentioned clothing-optional club for the first time by my now-fiancee. She later confessed it was partly a test, as she couldn’t be long-term with someone who wasn’t comfortable with that sort of thing (spoiler alert: I passed). There’s a fair bit of nudity (more female than male), a bit of sex, and a lesser amount of public sex. It is also one of the most women-friendly places you’ll find.

As my fiancée said, these sorts of places only exist if the women feel comfortable and secure. If they don’t then they leave, and don’t come back, and the whole scene dies. It’s an empowering environment and I dare say it’s far more feminist than most places in the day-to-day world. Women can express their sexuality exactly however they want without judgment or shaming. There’s lots of exhibitionism and everyone’s enjoying it.

When I first saw the Blurred Lines video it reminded me of this. Partly because this is my experience with topless ladies running around, and partly because the first time I heard this song I was actually at the club. So I’ve associated this song with liberation and sexuality and all those good things. When I first heard someone say the video was sexist it was like getting slapped. “Wait, what? The song I associate with one of the most anti-sexist places I know of is sexist? How can this be possible??”

It seems most people don’t draw this same association. Most people have never been in a safe sex-play area. For most people, their experiences of nearly-naked women interacting with clothed men consist of strip clubs. I’ve only ever been in a strip-club once, and that was a very limited engagement which probably wasn’t typical. From what I’ve heard of them, many strip clubs can be degrading and are filled with douchebags. I don’t want to cast stones at something I don’t have experience with, but they have a reputation as being frequented by sexist assholes.

So, sadly, the average viewer will not see this and associate it with “awesome liberated sexy-time fun!” but rather “dark dingy sexist titty bar”.  Thus the video’s bad reputation. I think it’s a test that our society has failed utterly, that this is the association people make. Once happy swinger clubs are the norm and shitty strip bars are almost impossible to find, videos like this will be associated with play rather than exploitation. How is it that the opposite of that is what ended up happening? The world is mad.

Aug 122013
 

A little over a week ago I heard Robin Thicke’s “Blurred Lines” for the first time, and I immediately loved it. The music was catchy and light, the vocals were fun, and the song was vaguely sexual. A good summer song. A friend who was with me at the time was surprised I hadn’t heard it before, and promised to email me with the artist & song name so I could listen to it again. The next day he sent me a link to the Unrated Video, and I immediately loved it even more. Several very hot ladies romping around nearly naked? What was not to like? :) And it fits the mood of the song very well.

Warning – extremely NSFW.

Since then I learned the video is sexist. This kinda surprised me. Me & my fiancée periodically attend a clothing-optional club and so I’m quite used to seeing naked people running around and having a good time. It’s never been sexist then, what’s different now?

It can’t be because the ladies are there on display – that’s always been half the point. Speaking both from personal experience and from talking to others (lest one think I’m presenting only the male opinion here) – people who go to those sorts of clubs are going with the intention of displaying themselves. It’s a lot of work to keep up (often a lot of money as well), people are proud of how they look, and they are showing off so people will look at them. I don’t feel comfortable accepting that people who are comfortable naked and enjoy displaying themselves are being sexist against themselves. That feels only a couple steps removed from demanding people wear burkas and saying it’s a pro-feminist thing to do so.

Yes, it’s objectification, but it’s a song about sex. A lot of sex is objectification. We are all sex objects for each other from time to time. It can be sexy as hell to be treated as a toy by someone else, or for them to let you treat them like one. It’s great fun when it’s consensual and well done – power imbalances are hot. It certainly isn’t sexist for us to be having sex the way we both want to be having it. Obviously this is confined to the bedroom/play-area… but the whole point of civil rights is that everyone is respected as a person, and that includes respecting our decision to bring objectification into our sex play when we want it. If the video had been taking place in an office, or out on the street, or really just about anywhere in day-to-day life it would be incredibly offensive. But it looks very much like it’s taking place in a safe sex-play area (soft pink walls, gentle lighting, semi-private). It’s a place where people go for this sort of fun, in a song about sex. I contrast this to Benny Benassi’s “Satisfaction” video  (also NSFW), which does strike me as sexist. There’s never nudity in that video, but the women are using all sorts of construction tools – something you’d see at work, or walking around town. That is NOT when someone is putting themselves out for objectification! Wrong message!!

As far as I can tell, Robin Thicke is just sharing the more private parts of sex-positive culture, and people are pattern-matching to sexist warning signs without actually taking the time to think if it’s actually sexist. But I’m very cautious that I might just have a blind spot for this video, so I’m leaving myself very open on this topic. I do already have one reservation about the video, and one about the song. And so much opinion is against me that I realize it’s most likely me that is wrong. But really… what am I missing? Does what I said above not apply in this case?