Oct 032012
 

The Wise Man’s Fear, by Patrick Rothfuss

Synopsis: The second book in the Kingkiller Trilogy. Kvothe continues his education at the University while searching for information about his family’s killers (the Chandrian) and trying to woo his first love (Denna). Along the way he learns magic, is taught the martial arts of the far east, spends time in the faire realm, and gets wrapped up in political intrigue. It sounds cliché when summarized like this, but it is extremely well done.

Brief Book Review: This book is amazing. The writing draws you in, the characters are realistic, and the plot keeps you reading long after you should’ve gone to bed/work/whatever. The only downside is that at nearly 1100 pages (!!!) it is a monster. But it is worth every single page. Strongly recommended.

Club Review: This is a bit more mixed, unfortunately. The fact that it’s 1100 pages is actually quite a deterrent for book clubbing, as many members won’t be able to finish it. If you do choose this book, it may be best to divide it over two meetings, discussing the first half at the first one and the second half at the second one. However this runs into the second problem – the book is very good, so there is very little to disagree on (very little “grist” as I would call it). There’s only so long that a group can relate great sections of the book and all agree how cool they were. There might be some minor irritations to discuss, but very little that is truly substantial. The book club meeting is likely to end a bit early.

There is a partial solution to this. This book (combined with the first one) is very much a puzzle, and pieces to fit it all together are littered everywhere. A fair bit of productive discussion can center around trying to decipher who is pulling what strings, how everything fits together, and predicting what will happen in the last book. Two bits of advice to aid in this: Patrick Rothfuss is very fond of Checkov’s Guns. What you thought was simply a cool bit of world-building almost always turns out to be a piece of puzzle that fills in some future gap. Everything is woven extremely tight. And in this vein, he is also fond of word play. Many things can be inferred simply based on the choice of words he uses. He has planted extremely fertile ground for extrapolation.

Finally, there’s the fact that if the third book delivers on the promise these first two have made, this will likely become the biggest fantasy trilogy of our generation. It’ll be known as much as the worlds of George RR Martin and Robert Jordan, maybe even JK Rowling. Wouldn’t you like to be in on it from the beginning, and not have to play catch-up later when it gets big? :)
Summary: A great book who’s length and lack of major problems actually work against it for book-club purposes. Recommended.

Sep 202012
 

Among Others, by Jo Walton

Synopsis: Set in ’79 and ’80, the diary of a teenage girl (Mor) who lost her twin and was herself crippled in a car accident. She deals with the loss by joining an SF book club. In the meantime, fairies help her defend herself from her evil witch mother.

Brief Book Review: A well written book with a few minor holes. An intimate portrayal of an isolated teen dealing with loss. Some readers may be put off by the lack of a plot, or that Mor seems far too wise for her age, but I didn’t mind the first and actively enjoyed the latter. Be prepared for more of an Oprah Book Club book rather than a SF book, but with all the positive aspects rather than the negative ones. Recommended.

Club Review: This book can be read in two very different ways, and once a reader latches on to one it is extremely hard to switch to the other. Different people will have very different reading experiences depending on which way they chose to interpret the story. This itself makes it a very strong book club book, as there will be a lot of comparing of notes on how the experience differed. There are a number of implied or veiled aspects to the story that can be disputed. The large number of references to 70s SF/F will get the older members of a group reminiscing about books of the past. The combination of powerlessness and frankness that characterize Mor make for some memorable lines. And the existence of a book club within the book makes for some fun comparison.

Summary: A strong book with some flaws that will give a book club a lot to chew over. The vagueness of it provides for a lot of reader interpretation, which makes for good discussion with others. Strongly recommended.

Sep 112012
 

Deadline, by Mira Grant


Synopsis: After his sister was murdered, Shaun now hallucinates her speaking to him constantly. He drives around a post-zombie-apocalypse US with his friends, making “witty banter” and trying to uncover a big government conspiracy to keep the populace timid and afraid.

Brief Book Review: Not much to like here. A longer review/FAQ here.

Club Review: It’s actually not terrible for a book club book. It’s rather long, but as mentioned in the FAQ, it’s very easy to skim. It’s much like a popcorn movie, you don’t have to put in much effort. It may make for a decent break between more demanding books. There are several really good scenes, but like most good scenes they don’t really provoke much discussion. There is a LOT to complain about, and if you like going MST3K on a book, this can provide for a fair bit of fun. The problem is that there isn’t much variety to the fun, as the same annoying items keep coming up over and over and you can’t really mock them more than once or twice. It is not nearly the beautiful MST3K-feast that something truly awful would be. It’s uniformly middlin’ bad, with some good bits here and there which don’t quite make up for it. It’s too bad this book isn’t worse, or better, or shorter (seriously, an editor would have made this a much better novel). If it was any of those it’d be easy to give it a mild recommendation, but it’s hard to slog through 600 pages of mediocre writing and repetitive snarky quips just for some exasperated venting.

I will note that several people actually gave it fairly decent ratings, despite it’s flaws. They felt it was light and fun enough that it wasn’t a loss.

Summary: Not worth it. It ends on a cliff hanger and I don’t care. I wouldn’t recommend it for book clubs, but not terrible.

Aug 292012
 

Of Blood And Honey, by Stina Leicht

Synopsis: A young man (Liam) in 1970s Northern Ireland joins the IRA, discovers he’s a werewolf, and is hunted both by the English Army and Catholic inquisitors. His friend and Catholic priest tries to convince the Church that the Fey and the Fallen are two different races and the Fey are not evil.

Brief Book Review: For the most part, the book is well written. It is very well researched, and the main character grows significantly throughout the story (I found him hard to relate to at first, but that changed as he did). There are a few noticeable problems, particularly the rather lack-luster finale, but on the whole it’s a very good book. Recommended.

Club Review: This is an ideal book for a book club. It has the perfect mix of strengths and weaknesses to really get people talking. The writing and plotting is rather strong most of the time, really drawing in the reader, but with some holes that attentive readers will catch and pick apart in kvetching sessions. More importantly, there are several things several major characters do (or fail to do) that can spark emotional reactions from readers that will likely be brought up, ranging from disbelief to outrage. Numerous aspects of the book can act as productive irritants – The strange moral landscape of the time period chafes a few times. The feeling of living in a divided and occupied country is vivid. The author is fairly even-handed with the political conflict by writing the story from the view of an originally disinterested youngster slowly drawn into political action through various personal forces. The political conflict is very nuanced and grey-shaded, with both sides acting in despicable ways and yet often not seeming unreasonable. The almost comically black-and-white Fallen-vs-Mortals conflict is incongruous enough (and unexplored enough) to make me suspect that future books will be drawing a parallel between the two wars to show that that the Fallen are not pure evil either and extermination is not a viable option.

A Warning – there are several extremely violent scenes. Moreso than most books.

Summary: Lots of grist here. A great mix of good and bad that’ll spark a lot of discussion, with group lamentation about the poor ending. The book itself is very enjoyable, which is a big bonus. Strongly Recommended for book clubs.

Aug 272012
 

I attended a bi-weekly book club, and I’ve noticed something interesting.

Books that are great to read don’t always make astounding books for a book club to read. Patrick Rothfuss’s The Name of the Wind is an amazing book. Utterly enjoyable, well written, and so on. But when we discussed it in our book club the meeting fell short, because there wasn’t that much to say. One can only repeat “This was great! Remember that awesome part where XYZ” so many times.

And books that are kinda crappy can sometimes make for fun discussion (in an MST3K kinda way). We’ve read some fairly bad crap, and the mockery can be very entertaining when done by a witty group with a good sense of humor (which, of course, we are. :) ) Even in otherwise good books it can help to have a few things to kvetch about (seriously, he’s STILL hung up on Denna? Sheez, get over it!)

A lot of books that are moderately enjoyable are absolutely great for book clubs, because there is room for diverging opinions and discussion. What I refer to as “grist”. Something that strikes one person as genius, but another as ham-handed, or pretentious. A fuzzy plot point that a world-class great author would have ironed out, but that leaves things ambiguous and open to interpretation (and thus argument). Some action, or technology, or magic, that one person things is completely unrealistic and/or out-of-character, that another thinks was well-played. Perhaps even politically or ethically controversial assertions. Little bits of irritant that form the focus for a pearl of conversation to coalesce around. These books make for great talks that can go on right up until your venue is closing down and clicking you out the door.

I did a quick google search (admittedly, nothing very indepth), and there doesn’t seem to be any sorts of Reviews of SF/F books for the purpose of book clubs out there. There’s plently of reviews of SF/F books. And there’s even a few Reviews of Books for Book Clubs (which would get the vapors if they read something like genre fiction!). But no reviews of SF/F Books for SF/F Book Clubs.

So I’m going to try my hand at it. Books will be reviewed only after our book club meeting, so I have some empirical evidence rather than just empty speculation. As any review, it is primarily a collection of my opinions, but the hope is that it’ll be opinions others will find useful in some way. First review coming later this week.

Jul 312012
 

Presenting the Deadline FAQ. All the questions about Mira Grant’s Deadline that you wish someone had asked before you picked up this book.

 

Q: Will there be spoilers?

A: SOOOOOOO many spoilers!

 

Q: This seems to be a direct rip-off of the internet-famous Transformers 2 FAQ. Why is that?

A: This book has the plotting and attention to detail of a Michael Bay movie, so I thought it’d be the most appropriate format.

 

Q: Ooooooh burn! But I assume that means we get lots of spectacular action scenes to make up for it!

A: It’s unfortunate you would assume that. One would think a book about zombies would have some excitement or terror in it at some point. Or maybe even a finale that happens to the protagonists. Instead, the awesome ZOMG-EPIC!! finale – a second Rising, a re-Apocalypse – happens entirely off-screen. Or rather, literally on a TV screen. Rather than involving the characters in any way, they just watch a couple news reports on CNN. That is the action-packed grand finale. It’s not quite as bad as listening to a radio report while stuck in traffic, but it’s close.

 

Q: Hold on, we’re getting ahead of ourselves – third answer and we’re already at the end of the book? Back up. This is a sequel so catch us up – at the beginning, what has Shaun been doing since the previous book?

A: Well it’s been about a year since Feed ended and his sister was murdered. Since that time Shaun’s been sitting around and thinking that he really ought to go and find out who was responsible for that. Unfortunately no convenient plot devices have dropped into his lap, so he hasn’t actually done anything.

 

Q: Why not? He’s a journalist! Shouldn’t he be out investigative-reportering all over this piece? Maybe setting down a lot of ground work off-screen so that the story can begin right as a crucial detail falls into place and the excitement starts?

A: He probably SHOULD, yes. But it seems Mira Grant doesn’t understand what journalist do. That’s a common theme in the book. Shaun and his team risk their lives to get crucial information that the public should know. Information along the lines of “the people you thought were protecting you are actually murdering US citizens, breeding a more deadly virus, and could have wiped out zombie-ism decades ago”. Forget Watergate, this is a 9/11 Truther’s wet dream. And Shaun makes sure this information is encrypted, hidden away, and not in any way released. Those responsible are trying to silence him, and the best way to stay on their hit-list is to make sure the truth dies with him!

 

Q: That’s staggeringly stupid. Why would he do that?

A: The book actually does a good job establishing that Shaun isn’t very bright. His main mode of interaction with other people is threats of beating/murder, and displays of physical violence. At one point he throws an incendiary grenade inside a building that HE IS IN. One that he believes is sealed and he has no way of getting out of. And that’s not even the dumbest thing he does.

 

Q: Woah. So… how does he uncover this vast conspiracy then?

A: A plot device falls in his lap. Technically, it knocks on his front door. To be fair, it is explained later as a trap by the villain to kill Shaun.

 

Q: Why would the villain bother to kill Shaun? I thought he was sitting around doing nothing and being a complete non-threat?

A: It’s because the villain is eeeeeeeviiiillllll. Seriously, he’s a moustache-twirler. Rather than save the world and cure the zombie plague he (and his cabal) are killing people who develop immunities and making stronger, better zombie viruses because that is Evilly Evil. It’s interesting, Mira apparently realized her last villain was an over-the-top caricature, and so explains that this was intentional so that everyone would focus on the Fake Evil Bad Guy and be distracted from the Real Guild of Calamitous Intent. However this is explained by a guy who is even MORE of a villain caricature. This information is literally revealed by the villain while he is Monologuing, as he is holding a pretty girl hostage. It’s hard to get any more clichéd.

 

Q: Hah!! I suppose they could have left the protagonists alone in an easily escapable room and expected an overly-elaborate death-trap to do them in, amirite? :)

A: …

 

Q: Oh you have GOT to be kidding me!?

A: Let’s just move on.

 

Q: So there have got to be some good parts to this book, right?

A: Actually yes, there are. This seems to be more of a relationship book, and the relationship in it is very strong. The whole dynamic of Shaun being crazy and speaking to his dead sister’s voice in his head works very well. His longing and pain is palpable and very touching. There are some truly great scenes of him pouring his heart out to her. The “Yup, they were sleeping together” reveal is exceptionally well done –

 

Q: I KNEW IT!!!

A: That’s not a question. But yes, all suspicions are confirmed, and it works very well. The scene when it’s revealed that Shaun didn’t need to kill her, she probably would have gotten better from the zombification, was also incredibly good. And some of the details – like him picking up her Coke-drinking habit after she dies even though he hates Coke – are also nice touches.

 

Q: Well why are you focusing on the bad stuff then?

A: Because there is so much bad stuff in between the few good scenes. This book is 600 pages, and should have been maybe 200. You can skim the majority of it, skipping whole paragraphs and sometimes whole pages, because the informational content of any given paragraph is so low. You know the first fifteen minutes of Manos: The Hands of Fate?

 

Q: You mean the movie often called one of the worst movies ever made? The first fifteen minutes of which consist of nothing but a car driving through a field while absolutely nothing happens?

A: That’s the one. A lot of the book is like that. Have you ever wanted to read about a loooooooooong road trip, through the middle of an abandoned country? Where uneventful rest-stops are described in detail? You can hear about every exciting stop for gas, and get a blow-by-blow description of the GPS unit re-routing our heroes along a slightly different path!

 

Q: But what would they eat on such a trip? What would they wear into the convenience store?

A: Fret not! You can read all about the outfits they change into as they made bathroom breaks. Thrill to the descriptions of meals of potato chips, donuts with bad plasticy frosting, seventeen bags of M&Ms, knock-off Everclear, and bottles and bottles of Coke!

 

Q: Couldn’t this narrative be spiced up with some automated blood tests?

A: Indeed! You will get to read about hundreds of blood tests! Every few pages will be another description of more blood tests, usually several at once! On multiple occasions we go directly from one blood test to ANOTHER blood test! How many times will the lights flash red/green? Only one way to find out!

 

Q: Actually, getting serious again – what do you mean potato chips, M&Ms, and Coke? Isn’t this a post-zombie-apocalypse novel?

A: Yeah, it’s weird. Despite the descriptions of abandoned rural areas and empty fields, there’s no food shortages. Cell phones are still cheaply available and there’s plenty of gasoline – it seems there hasn’t been any significant international trade disruption. It’s like the world didn’t even notice that a signification fraction of it was killed not that long ago. I suppose that’s not impossible a couple decades after the fact, Europe was well on the road to recovery a couple decades after WW2, but that took lots of support from the US, and they weren’t simultaneously flooded with the refugees of all of India. Much of the book didn’t seem well thought out or researched.

 

Q: I think you’re being a little too critical. It’s a zombie book, why go all deep-Stross on it?

A: OK, but even a lot of the surface-level plotting was simply nonsensical. A lot of the non-roadtrip action is breaking into CDC offices. Let’s play a game. You want to get into the guarded compound of the most powerful organization in the world. Go.

 

Q: Um… how would I do that?

A: Unspecificed! Let’s simply walk up to a front/side door and see what happens.

 

Q: Why am I doing this again?

A: We don’t know! Could be interesting. Maybe poke some extremely powerful people with sticks to see what happens. BTW – congrats, you made it into the world’s most powerful and evil HQ without a hitch.

 

Q: I did? But, aren’t these guys extremely powerful and scary? They sound kinda incompetent….

A: Yeah, it’s a bit hard to take them seriously. No matter how many times the narrator says “Big, Scary, Evil!  World-spanning Bad-ass Organization of Doom! Be Afraid!” it simply doesn’t make an impact when the actions we see from them are all weak, stupid, incompetent bumbling. It doesn’t evoke a lot of tension when you realize the villains are even dumber than the “let’s ride my motorcycle through a countryside infested with zombies instead of riding inside the armored van just a few yards ahead of me” hero.

 

Q: I’m not even going to dignify that with a comment. OK, so now that we made it inside without any opposition, what should we do?

A: Let’s just walk in and see what we can see. Hey, their entire plans for world domination via their hand-made super-zombie-virus are written out on this chalkboard? How handy!

 

Q: ARGH! My poor abused suspension of disbelief! It hurts!! But now how do I get out again?

A: You just happen to know about a “super-secret” passageway that comes standard in all CDC buildings and is never locked or guarded!

 

Q: I… what… NO! Screw this – I quit.

A: K, bye. Oh, BTW, George is resurrected at the end.

 

Q: WHAT!?!?!?!!?

A: Yeah, I know. :/

 

Bonus Round!

Q: OK, so despite my better judgement I went ahead and read this book. Can I ask a few follow-up questions?

A: Fire away.

 

Q: When Shaun says that the dog sniffed his crotch in the universal greeting of all dogs – how does he know that? There hasn’t been a dog big enough to reach his crotch alive in his entire lifetime.

A: Genetic memory…?

 

Q: And why the hell do they keep going back to Maggie’s place over and over? There’s absolutely no way the CDC hasn’t tracked them to it by now, it should’ve had a bomb dropped on it halfway through the book. And it completely removes any sense of danger or fear in the novel to have an impenetrable fortress you can fall back to at any time, rather than hiding in the ruins and praying you aren’t found. It makes the world-spanning extremely-powerful government agency feel like a kitten instead of an army of Terminators. Seriously, Maggie’s place was several times more secure than the CDC facilities. A rich kid’s mansion should not have security that makes the shadowy overlords of the country look feeble in comparison. The building housing the Ultimate Plans of Virus Purification was a tree-fort compared to Maggie’s place!

A: Think of the book as a video game (the author does, and specifically mentioned it a few times). After every level there’s a safe zone during which you can save your game and take as long as you need to rest, go to the bathroom, or finish your homework before you get back to it.

 

Q: Love that realism. Why did Dave have to die? I get that he had to hold down a button to keep a gate open, but that seems kinda dumb and contrived.

A: Motivation for the other characters, maybe? Since exposing the truth obviously isn’t a priority, and Shaun’s already been doing nothing about exacting revenge for his sister.

 

Q: Speaking of death – does his death really matter anymore? This is a world with resurrection tech now! We can bring back Buffy, Dave, Kelly, everyone! Huzzah!

A: Yup, death seems to be solved. Kinda makes that absolutely INCREDIBLE death-scene at the end of Feed pointless now, eh? And while it was certainly touching to see Shaun struggling with loneliness and survivor’s guilt, the entire first 98% of the book is now also less meaningful. It’s like a book about a family dealing with cancer in which on the last page it’s revealed that – good news! You don’t actually have cancer after all! The impact is muted. And it really changes the entire nature of the setting. This is no longer a zombie horror, it’s a post-mortality transhumanism story. Except I strongly suspect that the third book will continue pretending to be a zombie horror.

 

Q: Doesn’t solving death make the CDC the heroes of all humanity?

A: Well, I suppose it depends on just how much evil they did to get there. It’d certainly count as mitigating circumstances though. But I suspect they’ll somehow suppress it and use it only for their nefarious purposes.

 

Q: Which they would do… why, exactly?

A: Same reason they’re perfecting the zombie virus and murdering tons of civilians – they’re love being eeeeeeviiiiiilll!

 

Q: Of course. Why did I even ask?

A: The FAQ format demands it.